THE
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL
SADISM Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52) Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors. The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. Diagnostic Features The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to
individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those
who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of
another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary. ...Examples
of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological
suffering of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted
pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any
urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that
known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual.
Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of
pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any
significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological
suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or
fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that
they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by
such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder
despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes
clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying
Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically
motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk
of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B). "Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest. N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes for Blackface Costume By
Sonia Kennebeck, CNN Tue
February 26, 2013 Story
Highlights ·
Brooklyn Democrat Dov
Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party. ·
He apologized to "anyone who was
offended" but added, "that was not the intention." ·
One of his Assembly colleagues calls
the apology "a beginning" but inadequate. The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of
the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex, and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping, and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race, financial
issues, and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all junkies use
excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political, religious, social,
or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless they are stopped,
they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite for torture,
deviant sex, and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left unchecked, will
be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff addicts. Nothing more
– nothing less.
Ashkenazi sexual sadist achieving climax by
using a whip to rape a helpless human being to death.
|
African American History Month is Every Month!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jewish Community Failure
to Report is the Same as Enabling
Proof
of this higher sense of morality is evident in the European Jewish's
community's involvement in the genocide occurring in Darfur, Sudan. In the
New Jersey Jewish News, in an article entitled "Not on my Watch, it
states: "Proud of the fact that UJC MetroWest filled four buses with
some 400 rally-goers, Max Kleinman, the federation’s executive vice
president, said the coalition’s broad base "gives us the opportunity to
strengthen our relationship with the African-American community." The
article's title "Not on my Watch" makes it crystal clear -- that if
one is watching an act of wrongdoing, one has the moral responsibility to
report it. Another
example of the European Jewish community's will to report wrongdoing is
its dogged desire to ensure that the world knows of the Jewish Holocaust
where 6,000,000 Jews (actually there were 11,000,000 persons, but for reasons
unknown the 5,000,000 non-Jews are very rarely included). There are specific
days which commemorate the Jewish Holocaust. Grade schools, high school,
colleges, even work sites have ceremonies to ensure that the public never
forgets the lack of international involvement that led to the deaths of
millions of innocent people. Why
is it then, that members of the Jewish community devote much less time to
the Maafa, which lasted longer than the Holocaust of Germany and took
more lives? Why is the Jewish doctrine of the curse of black
skin — the diabolical teaching that led to the rationalization of
the world's worst Holocaust trivialized, or at least not given the airtime
that the Holocaust of Germany is given? ·
"According to the Alliance for
Authentic Judaism, Jews may not sue fellow Jews in Gentile courts, or
even call the police on another Jews..." ·
"No Jew or Jewess, wherever he
may be, is allowed to go to a non-Jewish court, or to their offices or
officers, without exception. If there should be any disagreement
between Jews, they should turn to a Jewish Beis
Din for their legal proceedings according to Jewish law…" ·
"It is not permissible under any
circumstances, to summon a fellow Jew to a non-Jewish court prior to
summoning him to a Jewish Beis Din…" ·
"No Jew, even if he is a rabbi or
leader, is allowed to permit other Jews to go to non-Jewish court before
summoning the other party to Beis Din…" ·
"A Jewish man or woman who calls
the police on the other, is included in the classification of
moser…a moser is a Jew who brings the unlawful activities of another Jew to
the attention of Gentile authorities. According to the Talmud, such "informers"
can be thrown into a pit and not brought out, i.e., murdered. ·
The Talmud also instructs its
followers to lie to non-Jews if the need arises: "Where a suit
arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former
according to te laws of Israel, justify him and
say: 'This is our law'; so also if you can justify him by the laws of
the heathens justify him and say [to the other party:] 'This is your
law'; but if this cannot be done, we use subterfuges to circumvent him.
— Babylonian
Talmud Tractate Baba Kamma 113a. While
the aforementioned statements do not specifically prevent Jews from publicly
disclosing the slanderous doctrine of the curse of black skin, it should be
clear to anyone that based on the above, not publicly disclosing the Jewish
community's involvement in the promulgation of the myth of black inferiority
is strongly implied. Proof of this implication is that fact that
Africans were enslaved by both European Christians and European Jews. After
the Emancipation Proclamation, neither European Christians nor European Jews
made any attempt to pay out money to the individuals that they had enslaved.
Both European Christian and European Jews capitalized financially by
continuing to pay African workers far less than their white
counterparts. As expressed by author Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht,
Jewish individuals took advantage of the low social status of their reputation-less
"schvartzes" by paying them next to
nothing. The
European Jewish community has a moral responsibility once and for all to
publicly admit that there are still individuals in this community that
believe and promulgate the slanderous Jewish religiously-fomented doctrine of
the curse of black skin. Its responsible rabbis must publicly admit that this
doctrine is a lie that has no basis in the Torah. They must publicly admit
that this doctrine was intended to dehumanize Africans so that rich members of
both the European Christian and European Jewish communities could take
advantage of Africans without a moral outcry from the white public. It must
publicly condemn those members, like Dov Ber
Schwartz and members of the Satmar community, who continue to teach this
doctrine to their congregants. And it must allow Africans to have access to
the names of those Jews who continue to disseminate this slanderous lie. Unless
it accedes to the above, the European Jewish community's failure to publicly
report the slander of Africans by its members will be seen as an act of
enabling and will be dealt with as such. One
cannot straddle the fence on this issue. Either one is a supporter of truth
and justice, or one is a supporter of hatred, bigotry and slander. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|